Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: THE STATE through Advocate-General, N. -W . F. P . , Pe shaw ar VS Respondent: SAHIBZADA HAYATULLAH
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pakistan Judge(s): Falak Sher, Abdul Hameed Dogar, Tasaddaq Hussain Jillani Title:THE STATE through Advocate-General, N. -W . F. P . , Pe shaw ar vs
SAHIBZADA HAYATULLAH Case No.: Criminal Petition No,19-P of 2003 Date of Judgment:2007-02-07 Reported As: 2007 SCMR 1366 Result: Petition allowed Judgment ORDER ' ABDUL HAMEED DOGAR, J.--- It is contended by Mr. M. Zaman Bhatti, learned Advocate Supreme Court for the petitioner that the learned High Court while acquitting the respondent has, not appreciated the evidence adduced by the prosecution in its true(?) perspective and the judgment is based on conjectures and surmises. It is further contended that the complainant Aurangzeb Khan P.W.7 as well as Gul Rehman P.W.8, the eye-witnesses have fully supported the case of the prosecution and there was no reason to discard their testimony. 2. The contentions require consideration. Accordingly, leave to appeal is granted to reappraise the prosecution evidence in its entirety for safe administration of justice. Bailable warrants in the sum of Rs,50,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of trial Court be issued against the respondent.