Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: PARKE DAVIS EMPLOYEES UNION, KARACHI VS Respondent: Messrs PARKE DAVIS & CO. LTD., KARACHI through its Director of Human Resources
Court Name: Labour Appellate Tribunal Judge(s): Mushtaq Ali Kazi Title:PARKE DAVIS EMPLOYEES UNION, KARACHI vs Messrs PARKE DAVIS & CO. LTD.,
KARACHI through its Director of Human Resources Case No.: Application No, KAR-190 of 1995 Date of Judgment:1995-05-21 Reported As: 1995 PLC 731 Result: Application dismissed Judgment DECISION ' This is an application under section 50 of the I.R.O., 1969 for interpretation of an alleged settlement between the C.BA. Of Parke Davis Employees' Union and the Management of M/s. Parke Davis & Company. 2. According to para. 22 of the settlement regarding gratuity it was provided that the question concerning improvements of gratuity benefits would be taken up by the company with the Head Office and when approval is received steps will be taken to effect the change. The matter was then referred to the Head Office. The Head Office proposed certain improvements but the . Matter stopped there. These improvements suggested by the Head Office were not referred to the C.BA. Nor was any supplementary settlement arrived at. The proposed changes, cannot be considered to be a settlement within the meaning of section 50 of the I.R.O. This application for interpretation of the proposal for improvements is not therefore maintainable. Since the proposal is yet to be agreed to by the C:BA. And made part of the settlement these steps have not been taken. Application is therefore dismissed in limine.