Al Wakeelo logo

Al Wakeelo

Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty

Initializing Secure Chambers

Const. P. 4283/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi - Karachi Cooperative Housing Societies Union & Ors (Petitioner) — 2025 SHC 1176

Official Citation: 2025 SHC 1176

Court / Jurisdiction: Sindh High Court

Petitioner: Const. P. 4283/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi - Karachi Cooperative Housing Societies Union & Ors (Petitioner)

Legal Principle & Question Decided

Ruling Summary: This decision was rendered by the Sindh High Court, officially reported as 2025 SHC 1176. In this matter between Const. P. 4283/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi - Karachi Cooperative Housing Societies Union & Ors (Petitioner) and the Respondent, the court adjudicated key questions of statutory construction, procedural regularity, and legal precedent under Pakistani law.

Core Holding: The honorable bench evaluated governing statutory provisions and judicial authorities to establish the rights of the parties, delivering the binding reasoning set out below.

Full Judgment Text & Judicial Ruling

COURT: Sindh High Court CASE NO: Const. P. 4283/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION: 2026 SHC KHI 1176 PARTIES: Karachi Cooperative Housing Societies Union & Ors (Petitioner) ORDER DATE: 18-MAY-26 BENCH: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Hasan (Akber) A.F.R: Yes ------------------------------------------------------------ ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH AT KARACHI

C.P. No.D-4283 of 2025 (Karachi CHS Union Ltd & another v SBCA & others)

Date Order with signature of Judge Before:- Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Kari Memon Mr. Justice Muhammad Hasan Akbar Date of hearing and order:-18.5.2026

[Ms. Syeda Abida Bukhari, advocate for petitioner No.1 Mr. Muhammad Vawda, advocate for petitioner No.2 Mr. Shariq A. Razzaq, advocate for respondents No.10-12 M/s Rafiq Ahmed Bhambro, advocate for respondent No.1(SBCA) a/w Mr. Aakash Mustafa Mr. Ali Zaidi, Addl. A.G. P.I. Zahid Hussain Qadri PS Bahadurabad is present ------------------------------------------ O R D E R Adnan-ul-Kari Memon, J At the very outset, learned counsel for the Petitioners, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the instant petition to the extent of Pe titioner No.2. Since no objection has been raised by the learned counsel for the Respondents, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn to the extent of Petitioner No.2. So far as Petitioner No.1 is concerned, learned counsel submits that the grievance of the Petitioner would stand adequately redressed if the Respondents are directed to satisfy and clear any lawful outstanding dues, liabilities, or obligations, of whatsoever nature, about Karachi Cooperative Housing Societies Union Ltd., strictly in accordance with law. Learned counsel for the private Respondents, while not disputing the proposition, has fairly agreed to the same, subject to all just exceptions and verification under the relevant legal framework. In view of the consensual stance adopted by the parties, and since the controversy does not survive for adjudication on merits at this stage, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the present proceedings pending. It is a settled principle that where parties arrive at an agreed arrangement capabl e of resolving the lis, the Court, while avoiding unnecessary adjudication, may dispose of the matter in terms of such consensus, provided the same is not contrary to law or public policy. Accordingly, without touching upon the merits of the case, and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the instant petition, along with all pending application(s), is disposed of with the observation that the Respondents shall pay lawful dues and liabilities, if payable, relating to Karachi Cooperative Housin g Societies Union Ltd. JUDGE JUDGE

Related Legal Research & Directories