Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: CHAN SHAH VS Respondent: STATEHonorable Justice SAJJAD AHMAD
1969 S C M R 55
1969 S C M R 55
Present : Hamoodur Rahman and Sajjad Ahmad, JJ
CHAN SHAH AND OTHERS‑Petitioners
versus
THE STATE‑Respondent
Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 269 of 1968, decided on 8th October 1968.
(On appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of West Pakistan, Lahore, dated 13‑6‑1968, in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 2006/68).
Bail
---Joint petition by several accused for Special Leave to Appeal before Supreme Court concerning bail‑During pendency of petition, bail granted by inquiry Court to some of petitioners Aggrieved petitioners, in circumstances, directed to move High Court first against fresh order rejecting their bail application.
S. Jamil Hussain Rizvi, Senior Advocate Supreme Court, instructed by Syed Wajid Hussain, Senior Attorney for Petitioners.
Nemo for the State.
Date of hearing : 8th October 1968.
JUDGMENT
SAJJAD AHMAD J.‑It is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioners that during the pendency of this petition, the inquiry Court which has recorded a good part of the evidence of the prosecution, has on x fresh application by the accused persons allowed bail to three of them and has refused it to the others. This has created a new situation rendering the present petition as infructuous. The aggrieved petitioners must try their remedy in the High Court against the fresh order rejecting their bail application before they make a resort to this Court.
The petition is dismissed.
Petition dismissed.