Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: MANZOORULLAH VS Respondent: INAYAT ALI
1988 S C M R 38
1988 S C M R 38
Present: Shafiur Rahman, Javid Iqbal and Saad Saood Jan, JJ
MANZOORULLAH--Petitioner
versus
INAYAT ALI and another--Respondents
Civil Miscellaneous Petition No.57-R/1987, decided on 3rd August, 1987.
(From the judgment of this Court dated 10-12-1986 passed in C.P.1115 of 1979).
Supreme Court Rules, 1980--
---O. XXVI, Rr. 4 & 6--Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts. 188 & 212(3)--Review--Certificate under R. 4 of O. XXVI, Supreme Court Rules not on record nor requirement of R.6 thereof fully satisfied- Petitioner undertaking to satisfy the requirements of the rules--Two similar petitions for leave to appeal arising out of same impugned judgment of Service Tribunal yet to be disposed of--Review petition directed to come up before an equally large Bench because in examining relief to be granted to petitioners, that judgment was also to come up for consideration.
Petitioner in person.
Nemo for Respondents.
Date of hearing: 3rd August, 1987.
ORDER
SHAFIUR RAHMAN, J.--The petitioner seeks review of our judgment dated 10-12-1986.
2. We find that the certificate required under Order XXVI, Rule 4 of the Supreme Court Rules, is not on record. The requirement of rule 6 has also not been fully satisfied as the Advocate who appeared at the hearing, has only undertaken to be present at the hearing. Unless the requirements of the rules are satisfied, the petition cannot be formally entertained. The petitioner undertakes to do so.
3. Two other petitions for leave to appeal (C.P.260 and 261 of 1980) arising out of the same judgment of the Service Tribunal as was dealt with by the judgment of this Court dated 10-12-1986 have yet to be disposed of. It is only proper that it should come up before an equally large Bench because in examining the relief to be granted to these petitioners, that judgment is also to come up under consideration.
S.Q./M-214/S Order accordingly.