Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: Mst. SAMEENA NAZ VS Respondent: THE STATE
Court Name: Lahore High Court Judge(s): Muhammad Munir Khan Title: Mst. SAMEENA NAZ vs THE STATE Case No.: Criminal Miscellaneous No 1847/B of 1984 Date of Judgment:1984-07-09 Reported As: 1987 MLD 1026 Result: Bail allowed
Judgment ORDER ' This is an application for bail on behalf of Mst. Sameena Naz petitioner in a case under section 307/109, P.P.C., registered at P.S. Badami Bagh, Lahore vide F.I.R. No, 221/84, dated 14-6-1984. 2. The prosecution case is that tte petitioner abetted Nazir Ahmad co-accused who launched murderous assault on Shaukat Ali, the father of the complainant and fired shots at him. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not present at the time of occurrence and as such her case is distinguishable. ' Learned counsel for the State however, opposed the plea for bail of the petitioner. 4. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties I find that the petitioner was not present at the time of occurrence and that she being a woman, her case falls within the second proviso to section 497, Cr.P.C. To my mind, it is a fit case for grant of bail. She shall be released on furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs,10,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of A .C./Duty Magistrate, Lahore.