Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: ALLAH DITTA and others VS Respondent: THE STATE
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pakistan Judge(s): Saad Saood Jan, Syed Usman Ali Shah Title: ALLAH DITTA and others vs THE STATE Case No.: Criminal Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No, 242 of 1989 Date of Judgment:1989-09-25 Reported As: 1990 SCMR 307 Result: Petition dismissed
Judgment ORDER ' USMAN ALI SHAH, J.--Leave to appeal has been sought by the petitioners against the order of the Lahore High Court, Multan Bench, dated 30-7-1989, whereby their Cr. Misc. Application for the grant of bail was rejected. ' The petitioners were charged under sections 307, 379, 302/14/149, P.P.C. Vide F.I.R. No, 183 dated 9- 6-1987 at Police Station Jalalpur Pirwala alongwith their other co-accused for the murder of Faiz Bakhsh. They were arrested on 21-6-1987 and since then they are in judicial custody. Their application for the grant of bail was rejected by the learned trial Judge on the ground that on nine dates of hearing adjournments were sought "on account of the accused" vide order dated 12-7- 1989. Against this order the petitioners filed criminal miscellaneous application before the learned High Court which was also dismissed by the learned Single Judge, vide his order dated 30-7-1989 on the ground that the next hearing in the case for the evidence is fixed on 17-9-1989. After hearing the learned counsel in support of this petition we find no reason to take a different view in the matter from that of the learned High Court as according to the learned counsel the next hearing in the case for the evidence is fixed on 3-10-1989 by the trial Court. Hence no ground is made out for the grant of leave. The petition is accordingly dismissed.
---
## Page 2
revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.