Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: JAVED BHATTI VS Respondent: THE STATE
Court Name: Lahore High Court Judge(s): Muhammad Akhtar Shabbir Title: JAVED BHATTI vs THE STATE Case No.: B.A. No.3080-B of 2003 Date of Judgment:2003-06-11 Reported As: 2005 YLR 1655 Result: Petition dismissed
Judgment ORDER ' The petitioner was nominated in the case F.I.R. No.663 of 2001 registered on 28-10-2001 under sections 13/14, 10/18 of Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hadood) Ordinance, 1979 at Police Station Factory Area, Lahore. The petitioner was allowed post-arrest bail by the learned Additional Sessions Judge. Meanwhile, the challan against the petitioner was sent to the Court and in response to the process issued against him, tKhe petitioner did not appear. The learned trial Court after adopting all modes of service against him issued non-bailable warrants of arrest. Thereafter he approached the learned Additional Sessions Judge for his pre-arrest bail which was declined vide order dated 23-5-2003 on the ground that he was a proclaimed offender and proceedings under section 521, Cr.P.C. Were initiated against him. The fugitive from law is not entitled to any concession of bail. ORDER ' The petitioner was nominated in the case F.I.R. No.663 of 2001 registered on 28-10-2001 under sections 13/14, 10/18 of Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hadood) Ordinance, 1979 at Police Station Factory Area, Lahore. The petitioner was allowed post-arrest bail by the learned Additional Sessions Judge. Meanwhile, the challan against the petitioner was sent to the Court and in response to the process issued against him, the petitioner did not appear. The learned trial Court after adopting all modes of service against him issued non-bailable warrants of arrest. Thereafter he approached the learned Additional Sessions Judge for his pre-arrest bail which was declined vide order dated 23-5-2003 on the ground that he was a proclaimed offender and proceedings under section 521, Cr.P.C. Were initiated against him. The fugitive from law is not entitled to any concession of bail. 2. For the foregoing reasons I am not inclined to grant him any discretionary relief. This petition being misconceived is dismissed.