Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: HUMAIR HAYAT KHAN ROKHRI and others VS Respondent: GOVERNMENT Of THE PUNJAB and others
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pakistan Judge(s): Saeeduzzaman Siddiqui, Abdul Qadeer Chaudhry, Wali Muhammad Khan Title:HUMAIR HAYAT KHAN ROKHRI and others vs GOVERNMENT Of THE PUNJAB
and others Case No.: Constitutional Petition No, 31 of 1993 Date of Judgment:1993-11-24 Reported As: 1994 SCMR 1790 Result: Order accordingly Judgment ORDER ' Learned counsel for the petitioners states that after the issuance of impugned Notification dated 15-8-1993, a number of writ petitions were filed in the Lahore High Court, challenging the above Notification. The learned Judge in Chamber heard the case on 11 dates, but ultimately passed the following order:- "The notes are not available, so the case would have to be re-heard afresh. Adjourned to 5-12- 1993." The writ petitions relating to the same cause and claiming the same relief, as claimed in this petition, are pending in the Lahore High Court. Some constitutional and legal points have been raised in the petition, therefore, we may have the advantage of the decision of the High Court. The anxiety of the learned Counsel for the petitionets is that delay in the disposal of the petitions will frustrate the very object of the petition. 2. We, expect and hope that the learned High Court will decide the matter without further delay. In view of the above observation, the learned Counsel lox the petitioners does not press this petition at present. Resultantly, this petition stands disposed of.
---
## Page 2
revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.