Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Official Citation: 2025 IHC 211699
Court / Jurisdiction: Islamabad High Court
Parties: Usman Shumail vs The State etc
Ruling Summary: This decision was rendered by the Islamabad High Court, officially reported as 2025 IHC 211699. In this matter between Usman Shumail and The State etc, the court adjudicated key questions of statutory construction, procedural regularity, and legal precedent under Pakistani law.
Core Holding: The honorable bench evaluated governing statutory provisions and judicial authorities to establish the rights of the parties, delivering the binding reasoning set out below.
COURT: Islamabad High Court (Honourable Mr. Justice Muhammad Asif) AUTHOR JUDGE: Honourable Mr. Justice Muhammad Asif DECISION DATE: 18-APR-2025 CASE NO: Criminal Miscellaneous-714-2025 CITATION: 2025 IHC 211699 PARTIES: Usman Shumail VS The State etc LAW / SECTION: - SUBJECT: Bail, After Arrest REMARKS: Post Arrest Bail in FIR No. 275/2024 dated 16.11.2024 U/s 21, 22, 22A PECA 2016 r/w 34, 109 PPC P.S. FIA Cyber Crime Reporting Centre, Islamabad ============================================================ Form No: HCJD/C-121 ORDER SHEET
IN THE ISLAMABAD HIGH COURT, ISLAMABAD (JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT)
Crl. Misc No. 714/2025
Usman Shumail
Versus
The State, etc.
S. No. of order/ proceedings Date of order/ proceedings Order with signature of Judge and that of parties or counsel where necessary. 18.04.2025 Mr. Osama Rehan Khan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Shaista Tabassum, Assistant Attorney General. Ms. Misbah Batool, Sub -Inspector, FIA, Cyber Crime Reporting Centre, Islamabad.
MUHAMMAD ASIF, J. Through instant Petition, the petitioner (Usman Shumail) seeks post-arrest bail in case FIR No. 275/2024 dated 16.11.2024 under Sections 21, 22, 22 -A & 24 of the Prevention of Electronic Crime Act, 2016 ( “PECA”) r/w sections 34 & 109 PPC registered with Police Station, FIA, CCRC, Islamabad. 2. As per contents of the FIR, the accused persons namely Moiz Imran S/o Imran Ul Haq, Usman S/o Shumail Iqbal Nagra, Alyan through Whats App Number 03014063332 and Agha Ali Khan through Mobi le Number 03005365778 with active connivance with each other and with malafide intention and ulterior motives had illegally and unauthorizedly captured/recorded sexually explicit videos/pictures of complainant minor daughter Hibba Sadiq Samana “aged about 17 years” and further blackmailed, harassed and threatened the complainant’s daughter and her family by transmitting/disseminating/publicly exhibiting the sexually
PAGE - 2
Crl. Misc. No. 714/2025 Usman Shumail v. The State, etc
explicit contents of the complainant’s minor daughter from WhatsApp accounts and Instagram, thus disgraced and destroyed the modesty and privacy of complainant’s daughter among her friends family and relatives. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner argued that the instant case is a result of malafide intention and ulterior motive; that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the instant case and he has nothing to do with the alleged offence; that the petitioner is behind the bars since his arrest; that the investigation in the ins tant case has been completed and the petitioner is no more required for further probe/investigation; that the main accused in the instant case has already been granted post-arrest bail by the learned trial Court, therefore the petitioner also deserves the same relief; and that the petitioner is non convict and non -record holder, therefore, entitled to the concession of post-arrest bail. 4. The learned Assistant Attorney General assisted by Ms. Misbah Batool, Sub Inspector FIA repelled the above submissions and argu ed that the petitioner is involved in heinous crime, sufficient incriminating material is available on record i.e. statement of accused/petitioner, mobile phone from which the picture and videos were uploaded, which prima facie connects the petitioner with the commission of the alleged offence, therefore, he is not entitled to the concession of post-arrest bail. 5. Arguments heard, record perused. 6. A bare p erusal of the record reveals that the petitioner has shared objectionable pictures and videos of the complainant’s daughter, namely Hibba Sadiq Samana (“victim”), on the internet through different WhatsApp numbers and Instagram accounts. The petitioner had used sexually explicit content of the victim to
PAGE - 3
Crl. Misc. No. 714/2025 Usman Shumail v. The State, etc
harass, blackmail, and threaten the complainant and her daughter by publicly uploading the same on fake Instagram accounts. 7. Furthermore, during the investigation, sufficient incriminating evidence has been collected by the FIA , including the recovery of WhatsApp numbers and mobile phones of the accused Moiz and Usman/petitioner . As per the FIA report, the accused is involved with the active connivance of the other co - accused, persons, in the commission of the alleged offence. 8. In the present case , sections 21 ,22, 22A and 24 of PECA, 2016 are attracted , the definition of the relevant sections of law has covered the act of the petitioner as displaying and transmitting the information to harm the reputation and privacy of the victim explicating the imag es in the form of nude photos and videos. These naked photos and videos available on the record have been admitted to be in the presence of the victim and the petitioner, which has even been verified by the FIA, through its report, the facts and findings from digital forensics of the mobile phone and WhatsApp numbers have been identified by the victim. 9. It is a general rule that when offences are punishable with less than 10 years of impri sonment ordinary, bails are granted however, in appropriate cases, it is never compulsion over the court to grant bail as a rule and may depart from this rule to deny any favor to the petitioner where the complainant/victim is helpless and has been victimized due to her nude images and videos and got blackmailed to fulfill illegitimate demand as in the case in hand. Complainant is stated to have been put under extortion of sending her images and nude videos to her friends, family and on social media. It is admitted fact that
PAGE - 4
Crl. Misc. No. 714/2025 Usman Shumail v. The State, etc
the petitioner has sexually harassed the complainant, who is a minor girl of about 17 years age. 10. The alleged offences fall within the ambit of the prohibitory clause of Section 497, Cr.P.C., where, grant of bail is a rule and refusal is an exception. The offence of uploading nude/naked/sexual content on websites/social media are increasing day by day and if these offences are not checked and controlled there will be no end. It cannot be convenient that the crimes are increasing and fast extending its adverse effects towards the youth and country, which is hazardous to the society at large , the case of the petitioner falls within the purview of exception, therefore, this court is not convinced to grant concession of post-arrest bail to the petitioner. 11. In view of the above tentative assessment, the petitioner has failed to make out the case for the grant of post - arrest bail at this stage. Consequently, the instant post -arrest bail petition is dismissed. 12. The observation s recorded hereinabove are tentative in nature and shall have no impact upon the merits of the case.
(MUHAMMAD ASIF) JUDGE
**//Kamran//**