Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: MOHARRAM BULEDI VS Respondent: THE STATE
Court Name: Sindh High Court Judge(s): Wajihuddin Ahmed Title: MOHARRAM BULEDI vs THE STATE Case No.:Criminal Revision Application No.38 and Miscellaneous Application No.917
of 1991, Date of Judgment:1991-06-10 Reported As: 1992 P Cr. L J 916 Result: Revision accepted Judgment ORDER Application for exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. 2. The sole ground on which the learned Court below has refused to accept the surety offered on behalf of the applicant is that such surety is resident of Larkana and on that basis the learned court was not satisfied that the surety could exercise necessary control for the production of the accused in Court. Mr. S. Sarfraz Ahmed; Additional Advocate-General, Sindh, who has waived of this Criminal Revision Application agrees that the impugned order, -dated 17-4-1991 does not conform to the requirements of law. Accordingly, I admit this Revision Application and with the consent of learned AA.-G., Sindh, allow the same requiring the court of the learned VIth Additional Sessions Judge, Karachi East, to proceed to examine the adequacy ' of the surety offered in accordance with law in which context the residence of the surety, if admitted to be anywhere in Pakistan, is not a relevant fact. Order accordingly.