Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: AMANULLAH KHAN SINDHOO VS Respondent: SHABIR HUSSAIN, S. H. 0. POLICE STATION SUTRAH,DISTRICT SIALKOT AND ANOTHER
Court Name: Lahore High Court Judge(s): Akhtar Hassan Title:AMANULLAH KHAN SINDHOO vs SHABIR HUSSAIN, S. H. 0. POLICE STATION
SUTRAH,DISTRICT SIALKOT AND ANOTHER Case No.: Criminal Miscellaneous No, 375-H of 1983 Date of Judgment:1983-08-23 Reported As: 1984 P Cr. L J 3096 (1) Result: Petition filed Judgment ORDER ' The detenu has appeared before me. The bailiff has filed his report. Statements of the detenu as also the S. H. 0. Have been recorded. It has been indicated by the S. H. 0. That a case of theft has been registered in the Thana and-that the detenu was wanted as a suspect. However, he denies that he had detained him for any length of time. He states that he called him on 16th August 1983 and that after some interrogation had let him off. 2. The detenu in his own place says that now he is free. No further action is needed. 3. Counsel for the petitioner presses for costs as according to him the detenu and his mother were maltreated by the respondent No, 1 S. H. 0. It is a question of fact. The allegation is controverted. The broad fact is that a case was registered and the respondent had legal power to call suspects. Stricto sensu, there is no justification to burden him with costs. The petition is filed. Security be refunded to the petitioner. .