Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Official Citation: 2022 PLD 9
Court / Jurisdiction: FEDERAL-SHARIAT-COURT
Parties: HAMMAD HUSSAIN vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice, IslamabadHonorable Justice Dr. Syed Muhammad Anwer
This judicial decision was delivered by the FEDERAL-SHARIAT-COURT. The matter involves proceedings between HAMMAD HUSSAIN and FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice, IslamabadHonorable Justice Dr. Syed Muhammad Anwer, officially reported as 2022 PLD 9. The court reviewed applicable Pakistani statutes, procedural requirements, and governing case-law authorities. The full text below contains the complete facts, arguments, and legal reasoning rendered by the honorable bench.
P L D 2022 Federal Shariat Court 9 Before Muhammad Noor Meskanzai, C.J., Dr. Syed Muhammad Anwer and Khadim Hussain M. Shaikh, JJ HAMMAD HUSSAIN and another---Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice, Islamabad and another---Respondents Shariat Petition No. 02/I of 2021, decided on 25th October, 2021. Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964)--- ----S. 10(3)---Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964), S. 10(3) [as amended for Punjab by the Family Courts (Amendment) Act (XI of 2015)]---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 203-D---Shariat petition---Family Court, powers of---Pre-trial proceedings---Attempt to effect a compromise or reconciliation between the parties---Repugnancy to Injunctions of Islam---Plea that the Quran and Ahadith of the Prophet (pbuh) stressed upon the importance of making compromise (sulah) between any conflicting parties in general; that Islam also gave much importance to family system, therefore, in light of Ayat 35 of Surah Al-Nisa of the Holy Quran, the process of reconciliation referred to in S.10(3) of the Family Courts Act, 1964 must be made mandatory upon the Family Courts---Held, that the Quran and Sunnah stressed upon reconciliation and compromise to be made between the spouses in case any unpleasant rift occurred between them to avoid divorce---Quran put a moral and religious duty upon the elders and family members of the parties to put efforts for making a compromise between the spouses in case any unpleasant rift occurred between them---Ayat 35 of Sura Al-Nisa of the Holy Quran explained the manner in which such reconciliation efforts may be made between the parties within the family---Ayat 35 of Sura Al-Nisa was directed for the family members and elders of the conflicting spouses for making compromise or doing efforts for reconciliation between them---Even otherwise the jurisprudence of Federal Shariat Court was clear on the issue that the authority given to Family Court for reconciliation or compromise at pre-trial proceedings under S.10 of the Family Courts Act, 1964 or after conclusion of trial under S.12 of the said Act, was adopted on the basis of Ayat 35 of Sura Al-Nisa of Holy Quran---Shariat petition challenging S.10(3) of the Family Courts Act, 1964 was dismissed accordingly. Petitioner No.2 in person. Date of hearing: 2nd June, 2021. ORDER DR. SYED MUHAMMAD ANWER, J.---The petitioners have filed this Shariat petition under Article 203-D of the Constitution through which they have challenged section 10(3) of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act (Act XXXV of 1964), which according to them is repugnant to the injunctions of Islam. In addition to that, they also challenged-section 10(3) of the Family Courts Act, 1964 (As amended for Punjab). The West Pakistan Family Courts (Act XXXV of 1964) states as follow: "10. Pre-trial proceedings.---(1) When the written statement is filed, the Court shall fix an early date for a pretrial hearing of the case. (2) --- (3) At the pre-trial, the Court shall ascertain the points at issue between the parties and attempt to effect a compromise or reconciliation between the parties, if this be possible." Section 10(3) of the Family Courts Act, 1964 (As amended for Punjab) states as follow: "10. Pre-trial proceedings.--- (1) When the written statement is filed, the Court shall fix an early date for a pre-trial hearing of the case. (2) --- (3) The---Family Court may, at the pre-trial stage, ascertain the precise points of controversy between the parties and attempt to effect compromise between the parties." The petitioners state that the said provision of the stated laws are in conflict with Ayat 35 of Surah Nisa. They also relied upon two Ahadis, from Sunan Abu Dawood, which stress upon the importance of making compromise (sulah) between any conflicting parties in general. The petitioners made arguments in favour of their petition. The petitioners also stressed upon the importance of family system in Islam. While relying upon Ayat 35 of Surah Nisa, the petitioners claimed that the process of reconciliation referred to in the impugned section of the law must be made mandatory upon the Family Courts. 2. We have heard the arguments and reached at the following conclusions: i) it is correct understanding of the petitioners that in Islamic society, the protection of family unit or family system has core-importance, which is rightly reflected in Article 35 of the Constitution of Pakistan, 1973 stating one of the principles of policies in the Constitution. Article 35 states that "the State shall protect the marriage, the family, the mother and the child"; ii) in the light of Quran and Sunnah, divorce is legally permissible but it is considered as the most abhorrent and unpleasant act; therefore, Quran and Sunnah stress upon reconciliation and compromise to be made between the spouses in case of any unpleasant rift occurs between them to avoid divorce. The Quran puts a moral and religious duty upon the elders and family members of the parties to put efforts for making a compromise between the spouses in case any unpleasant rift occurs between them. The referred Ayat of Sura Al-Nisa explains the manner in which such reconciliation efforts may be made between the parties within the family. The Ayat 35 of Sura Al-Nisa is directed for the family members and elders of the conflicting spouses for making compromise or doing efforts for reconciliation between them. For ready-reference, the Ayat 35 of Sura Nisa is reproduced below:
3. This matter was very clearly decided by this Hon'ble Court in Para-8 of its earlier judgment dated 04.07.2013, whereby Sh. Petition No.20-I of 1999 titled "Muhammad Zoonnoon Khan v. Federal Government of Pakistan and another" and Sh. Petition No.06-I of 2010 titled "Muhammad Shah, etc. v. The State" in which it was pointed out that the authority given to Family Court for reconciliation or compromise at pre-trial proceedings under Section 10 of the Family Courts Act, 1964 or after conclusion of trial under Section 12 of the said Act, is adopted on the basis of Verse 35 of Sura Al-Nisa of Holy Quran. The reference made by the petitioners to the Holy Quran and Sunnah while challenging Section 10(3) of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act (Act XXXV of 1964) and section 10(3) of the Family Courts Act, 1964 (As amended for Punjab) is completely misconceived. Hence, the Shariat petition is dismissed accordingly and the Shariat Miscellaneous Application No.4-I of 2021 being infructuous is disposed of. MWA/19/FSC Petition dismissed.