Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: Ch. MUHAMMAD SHARIF VS Respondent: Ch. MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pakistan Judge(s): Muhammad Afzal Zullah, Dr. Javed Iqbal Title: Ch. MUHAMMAD SHARIF vs Ch. MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN Case No.: Civil Petition No,77 of 1983 Date of Judgment:1988-08-08 Reported As: 1989 SCMR 1127 Result: Leave refused
Judgment ORDER ' MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.--Leave to appeal has been sought by a debtor/defendant against a money decree and the consequential dismissal of his civil revision in that behalf. Learned counsel has contended that in the background of the case, regarding which he gave the detailed facts, the execution of the promissory note relied upon by the respondent's side is not denied. But there was not enough evidence to show that the money consideration had passed between the parties. He has also tried to show that the promissory note in question has been misread. ' After hearing the learned counsel at some length, we have not been able to find any such infirmity in the findings and the decisions of the learned two Courts below so as to attract the corrective civil revisional jurisdiction of the High Court under section 115, C.P.C. The impugned judgment does not suffer from any infirmity, legal or otherwise. ' Leave to appeal is, therefore, refused.