Legal Principle & Question Decided

Ruling Summary: This decision was rendered by the Sindh High Court, officially reported as 2025 SHC 3203. In this matter between Const. P. 660/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi - Muhammad Ali s/o Bashir Ahmed Taimoor (Petitioner) and the Respondent, the court adjudicated key questions of statutory construction, procedural regularity, and legal precedent under Pakistani law.

Core Holding: The honorable bench evaluated governing statutory provisions and judicial authorities to establish the rights of the parties, delivering the binding reasoning set out below.

Full Judgment Text & Judicial Ruling

COURT: Sindh High Court CASE NO: Const. P. 660/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION: 2025 SHC KHI 3203 PARTIES: Muhammad Ali s/o Bashir Ahmed Taimoor (Petitioner) ORDER DATE: 08-SEP-25 BENCH: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) A.F.R: Yes ------------------------------------------------------------ [1]

ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH AT KARACHI

Constitutional Petition No. S-660 of 2025

Date Order with signature of Judge(s)

1. For order on office objection Nos.1 to 9 alongwith reply as at “A” 2. For hearing of main case

08.9.2025

Mr. Shujaat Ali Khan advocate for the petitioner Mr. Ali Safdar Depar, Assistant AG Mr. Raza Mian, DSP (Legal-II) CPO PI/SHO Ayaz Khan SI Nasrullah Khan, PS Jackson, Karachi DSP Sultan Ahmed Chandio, SDPO, Dadu Panah Ali Shah, DSP Legal on behalf of respondent No.3 Inspector Noor Mustafa Pathan, SHO PS A-Section Dadu Inspector Benazeer Jamali, SHO PS B-Section, Dadu --------------------------------

Petitioner Muhammad Ali has filed this Constitutional Petition under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 with the following prayer: - A. To take strict Legal action against the Respondent No.7 and her companions as per contents of the Petition, and restrain them from their illegal acts, harassing, pressurizing, torturing, blackmailing as well as issuing threats of implicating the Petitioner and his family members in the false cases as well as of dire consequences.

B. To direct the Respondents No.1 to 6, to provide protection to the Petitioner and his Family Members and their Liberty from the hands of the Respondent No.7 and others acting on her behalf.

C. To direct the Respondents No.3 to 7, their Subordinates, Representatives or anybody else acting on their behalf to not Harass the Petitioner and the Petitioner may be allowed to live in his house a long with his Family and look after his 100 Years Old Father and ailing Mother.

D. To direct the Respondents No.3 to 7, their Subordinates, Representatives or anybody else acting on their behalf to not create hurdle and close the ways of the Petitioner to his House and Bread earning place (Ali Medical Store).

E. To direct the Respondents No.2 and 6 to provide Protection to the Petitioner for safe living in his House and freely work at his Medical Store.

F. To direct the Respondents No.3 to 7, their Subordinates, agents, servants, colleagues, representative and or anybody else acting on their behalf from interfering in their personal life and harassing in any manner whatsoever in nature.

This Court vide order dated 18.8.2025 issued notices to the respondents. Official respondents are present in Court and state that neither they have harassed the petitioner nor intend to do so in future rather they shall act strictly in accordance with law. In view of above statement of the official respondents, this petition stan ds disposed of with directions to the official respondents not to cause any sort of harassment to the petitioner and shall act strictly in accordance with law.

JUDGE

Zahid/*

[2]

Related Legal Research & Directories

• Browse all judgments from Sindh High Court
• Search Pakistani statutes: Constitution of Pakistan 1973, PPC, CrPC, CPC & Family Laws
• Analyze this case with Al Wakeelo AI Legal Assistant