Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: SARGODHA TEXTILE MILLS LTD. VS Respondent: ABDUL HALEEM
Court Name: Labour Appellate Tribunal Judge(s): Sardar Muhammad Abdul Ghafoor Khan Lodhi Title: SARGODHA TEXTILE MILLS LTD. vs ABDUL HALEEM Case No.: Petition No, SG-49 of 1982 Date of Judgment:1982-05-15 Reported As: 1984 PLC 526 Result: Order accordingly
JUDGMENT
JUDGMENT ' This review petition is for correction of the judgment of this Court, dated 31st January, 1982, whereby it was observed that the direction of payment of back benefits made by the learned lower Court was justified. In reality, the learned Lower Court had reinstated the respondent without back benefits but due to oversight or typing mistake in the first paragraph of judgment it was mentioned that the respondent was reinstated by the learned Lower Court with back benefits. On account of this error made in the first paragraph of the judgment, in the end it was observed that deduction of the payment of back benefits was justified. 2. There is no provision of review in the I. R. 0. But there is no restriction upon the correction of clerical and typing mistake. It is, therefore, ordered that in the first paragraph of the judgment of this Court, dated 31s January, 1982 the words 'with back benefits' be corrected to 'without back benefits' and consequently the last but one sentence of the judgment will read "since intentionally such an officer was appointed as the Enquiry Officer the direction of payment of back benefits also appears to be justified" be deleted.