Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: ZAFAR ALAM VS Respondent: THE STATE
Court Name: Sindh High Court Judge(s): Abdul Qadeer Chaudhry Title: ZAFAR ALAM vs THE STATE Case No.: Criminal Bail Application No, 1376 of 1986 Date of Judgment:1986-09-10 Reported As: 1987 MLD 1211 Result: Bail refused
Judgment ORDER ' The applicant is facing trial under secton 17(3) of Hudood Ordinance. He absented himself from the proceedings and non-bailable warrants were issued against him. He appeared before the Court. He remained absent for a period of six months and the Court condoned the absence. But again on 10- 3- 1984 the applicant absconded and did not attend the Court. He appeared on 1- 9- 1986 and for the second time he remained absent for 2- 1/2 years. Thus, he has misused the concession of bail twice. On such grounds his application was rejected by the learned Additional Sessions Judge and I see no reason to interfere with the said order as the applicant did not care to attend the Court. ' The application is dismissed.