Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: ABDUL QAYYUM NIAZI VS Respondent: THE STATE-
Court Name: Lahore High Court Judge(s): Muhammad Zafarullah Title: ABDUL QAYYUM NIAZI vs THE STATE- Case No.: Criminal Miscellaneous No. 2122/13 Date of Judgment:1982-09-05 Reported As: 1987 P Cr. L J 690 Result: Bail refused
Judgment ORDER According to the allegations the petitioner used to tease the daughter of the complainant who is a student of 8th Class for which the complainant reprimanded the petitioner. It is alleged that in retaliation the petitioner picked up Khaliqur Rahman aged 2-- years grand-son of the complainant and left him only when he was given a chase by the father of the child and other witnesses. The learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that the allegations of an offence under section 364-A, P.P.C. Against the petitioner are false and that the case has been made out only on account of the teasing of the girl by the petitioner. I am afraid, I find no force in this argument particularly when it is an admitted position that there is no previous enmity between the parties. The complainant is said to be a responsible businessman and no reason has been given for false implication of the present petitioner. The teasing of the girl by the petitioner can both be a motive for false implication as well as a motive for the petitioner to commit the offence in retaliation of the reprimand being given to him. It, therefore, does not help the petitioner for his prayer for grant of bail. In view of the above considerations, the petitioner does not deserve any special consideration. The application is rejected.
---
## Page 2
revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.