Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Official Citation: 2024 SHC 2089
Court / Jurisdiction: Sindh High Court
Petitioner: Criminal Miscelleneous 234/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi - SAVAID AHMED S/O MUHAMMAD KHURSHEED QURESHI (Applicant)
Ruling Summary: This decision was rendered by the Sindh High Court, officially reported as 2024 SHC 2089. In this matter between Criminal Miscelleneous 234/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi - SAVAID AHMED S/O MUHAMMAD KHURSHEED QURESHI (Applicant) and the Respondent, the court adjudicated key questions of statutory construction, procedural regularity, and legal precedent under Pakistani law.
Core Holding: The honorable bench evaluated governing statutory provisions and judicial authorities to establish the rights of the parties, delivering the binding reasoning set out below.
COURT: Sindh High Court CASE NO: Criminal Miscelleneous 234/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION: 2025 SHC KHI 2089 PARTIES: SAVAID AHMED S/O MUHAMMAD KHURSHEED QURESHI (Applicant) ORDER DATE: 07-AUG-25 BENCH: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Miran Muhammad Shah(Author) A.F.R: Yes ------------------------------------------------------------ 1
ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH KARACHI Criminal Misc. Appln. No. 234 of 2024 DATE ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE
Applicant : Savaid Ahmed son of Muhammad Khursheed Qureshi, Through Abdul Wahab Mirza, advocate Versus Respondents. : 1. The State. 2. The SHO police station Surjani. 3. The Senior Superintendent of Police, 4. Touseef son of Not known. 5. Zeeshan son of Not known. All through Mr. Muhammad Noonari, Deputy Prosecutor General, Sindh. Date of hearing : 30.07.2025. Date of order : 07.08.2025. O R D E R. MIRAN MUAHAMMAD SHAH, J.:- Through this Criminal Misc. Application, the applicant namely Savaid Ahmed son of Muhammad Khursheed Qureshi has challenged the order dated 07.02.2024, passed by the learned VII th Additional Sessions Judge, Karachi (West) in Criminal Misc. Application No.338 of 2024, whereby the applicant’s request for the lodgment of the FIR against the proposed accused . The applicant ha d approached the Court of the District and Sessions/Ex - Officio Justice of Peace, West at Karachi, by filing Criminal Misc. Application No.338 of 2024 under Section 22 -A and 22 -B Cr.P.C for seeking directions for the registration of the FIR against the proposed accused person . The matter was assigned to the learned VII th Additional Sessions Judge, Karachi-West, who after hearing the parties dismissed the application through the impugned order dated 07.02.2024. Hence this application. 2. The learned counsel for the submits that the applicant is the lawful owner of an immovable property, specifically House No. L - 836, Sector 4 -A, Surjani Town, Karachi ; that the property is registered in the name of the applicant’s deceased mother, Mst. Razia Kh ursheed. The house ha d remained vacant for a long period, and the applicant had been regularly visiting the property every 2 –3 months , that on
2
22.11.2023, during one of his routine visits, the applicant was shocked to find that some individuals had unlawfully occupied the house after forcibly breaking its locks. Upon making this discovery, the applicant raised his voice and called out to the occupants ; that in response, two individuals, later identified as Touseef and Zeeshan, emerged from the premises, when the applicant inquired about their identi fied and their present in his property, the individuals became hostile, misbehaving, insulting, abusing and threatening the applicant, that the applicant also asked them to show any documents regarding their claim over the said house, but they failed to do so, that in contrast, the applicant showed the title documents proving his ownership of the property. Despite this, the individuals forcibly pushed the applicant out of the house and unlawfully took possession of it, that the applicant is the lawful owner of the property but the proposed Accused Touseef and Zeeshan along with their associates have illegally occupied the same . Their actions constitute a criminal offence, and they are liable for punishment under the law and furthermore, the proposed accused and their companions have continued to harass, mentally torment and threatening the applicant and his family including threats of bodily harm and even death. Under these circumstances, the applicant moved so many applications through courier service to the official r espondents, for taking legal action against the proposed accused and provide legal protection for himself and his family. Despite these efforts, the respondents have failed to take any action. As the ap plicant has no other effective or timely remedy available, he is compelled to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court by filing the present petition for directions to respondent No.2 to record the statement of the applicant and register the FIR against the a bove named proposed accused and anyone who found in illegal possession of the said house without any legal authority for the cognizable offence committed by them as well as provide legal protection to applicant and his family members from the hands of prop osed accused and their companions . He lastly prays for allowing the instant Criminal Misc. Application.
3
3. On the other hand, the learned Deputy Prosecutor General, Sindh opposes the grant of the instant Criminal Misc. Application. 4. I have heard th e learned counsel for the parties at length. The impugned order has been challenged by the applicant for lodgment of the FIR under Section 22 -A and 22 -B Cr.P.C. I have gone through the impugned order, which categorically is based on the report of the SHO . The matter appears to be purely of civil dispute between the parties over the property. No cognizable offence seems to have been made out; therefore, the application of the applicant was rightly dismissed. I do not see any misreading or non -reading of the facts in the impugned order. The applicant has merely alleged that he was threatened in an attempt to give a criminal color to a civil dispute, which lacks merit. During the course of arguments, the applicant’s counsel himself partially admitted that the d ispute is of a civil nature, stating that the applicant’s property had allegedly been illegally occupied by the private respondents. In such a case, the appropriate remedy lies under the Illegal Dispossession Act, which is available to the applicant. At th e end of the arguments, this court advised the learned counsel for the applicant that he may avail himself of the remedy provided under the prescribed civil law. 5. In view of the above, the instant Criminal Misc. Application is dismissed as being devoid of any merits and not maintainable. These are the reasons of my short order dated 30.07.2025.
JUDGE Manthar Brohi.