Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: BARKAT ALI VS Respondent: The STATE
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pakistan Judge(s): Salahuddin Ahmad, Waheeduddin Ahmad, Sajjad Ahmad Jan Title: BARKAT ALI vs The STATE Case No.:Criminal Review Petition No. 3 of 1972 Petition No. 262 of 1971 Appeal No. 262
of 1971 Date of Judgment:1972-11-01 Reported As: 1981 S.C M R 917 Result: Petition dismissed Judgment ORDER, WAHEEDUDDIN AHMAD, J.-This is a review .Petition against the order of this Court in Criminal Petition for Special Leave to appeal No. 262 of 1971, dated the 4th April, 1972. The petition was dismissed. It appears from the record that Mr. K. H. Khurshid argued the above petition and under the rules except with the special leave of the Court, no' application can be drawn by any Advocate other than the Advocate who appeared at the hearing of the case in which the judgment or order, sought to be reviewed was made. It is also provided that such Advocate shall, unless his presence has been dispensed with, be present at the hearing of the application for review. In this connection re--ference may be made to Order XXVI, rule 5 of the Pakistan Supreme Court Rules. In the present case, it is admitted by Mr. Saved Hassan that the Petition was drawn by him. It was not drawn by Mr. K. H.) Khurshid who conduced the leave petition. Mr. K. H. Khurshid is also not present today., :In these circumstances, the review petition is against the rules and is liable to be dismissed. We would, therefore, dismiss the review petition Review Petition dismissed.