NANI GOPAL KAR CHOWDHURY vs MESSRS SURRIDGE AND BEECHENO Case No — 1971 PLC 541

Citation: 1971 PLC 541

Court: Labour Court

Year: 1970

Decision Date: 1970-08-15

Parties: NANI GOPAL KAR CHOWDHURY vs MESSRS SURRIDGE AND BEECHENO

Headnotes

1 Result: N/A Judgment AWARD MD. NURUL HUDA (CHAIRMAN).

Judgment Text

Court Name: Labour Court Judge(s): M. A. Sabur, Juned Ahmed Chaudhry, Ms. Nurul Huda Title: NANI GOPAL KAR CHOWDHURY vs MESSRS SURRIDGE AND BEECHENO Case No.: Complaint No. 84 of 1970 Date of Judgment:1970-08-15 Reported As: 1971 P LC 541 Result: N/A Judgment AWARD MD. NURUL HUDA (CHAIRMAN). - Nani Gopal Kar Chowdhury is the petitioner in this case. It is his case that he was a Typist under the second party Messrs Surridge and Beecheno. He was appointed on 21-6-1968 at a monthly pay of Rs. 280'00. His services were terminated on 26-12-69 by the second party without giving him any opportunity to explain his conduct. He thereupon submitted a grievance petition on 3-1-1970, but to no effect, So, the petitioner has come before the Court by way of an application under section 25(1)(b) of the East Pakistan Employment of Labour (Standing Orders) Act, 1965 paying for re-instatement in his service or for termination benefits available to him under the law. The second party in a written statement contends that the second party being an Advocates firm, the provisions of the East Pakistan Employment of Labour (Standing Orders) Act, 1965, are not applicable to it. It is further contended that the petitioner was appointed on probationary basis with the understanding that he would acquire proficiency in short-hand. It is said that his probationary period was extended, but he could not acquire proficiency in short-hand and as such, he was considered unsuit--able and there has been a…

Read the full judgment on Al Wakeelo — Pakistan's AI-powered legal research platform.