Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: FAZAL VS Respondent: THE STATE
Court Name: Lahore High Court Judge(s): Sh. Ijaz Nisar Title: FAZAL vs THE STATE Case No.: Criminal Miscellaneous No- 1271/B of 1984 Date of Judgment:1984-06-02 Reported As: 1986 P Cr. L J 1023 Result: Bail allowed
JUDGMENT
JUDGMENT Fazal petitioner alongwith two others stand charged with the of Nawab deceased on 23-3-1984 with a hatchet. 2. Bail is urged on the ground that the petitioner was empty-handed with no allegation of causing any injury to the deceased and is merely alleged to have held the deceased in Japha, while his co- accused Abdul Satter caused two hatchet blows to the deceased which proved fatal. It is further stated that Abdul Sattar is also injured with no explanation of his injuries. Most probably there was a brawl between Abdul Sattar and the deceased in which both injured each other, it is added. Learned counsel for the petitioner has cited a number. Of precedents where bail was granted to the accused who had not caused injuries to the deceased but merely held him in. Japha. Keeping in view the above circumstances. I allow bail to the petitioner in the sum of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of A. C. , Okara.