Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: KAPTAN VS Respondent: THE STATE
Court Name: Sindh High Court Judge(s): Muhammad Mujeebullah Siddiqui Title: KAPTAN vs THE STATE Case No.: Criminal Bail Application No,28 of 2006 Date of Judgment:2006-05-26 Reported As: 2007 MLD 1033 Result: Bail Refused
Judgment ORDER ' MUHAMMAD MUJEEBULLAH SIDDIQUI, J.---Granted with all just exceptions. 2. The bail is sought on the ground of hardship. A report wascalled from the learned trial Court. The learned trial Court has reported that charge was framed on 28-2-2006. The absconders have been declared proclaimed offenders. On 20-4-2006 medical officer waspresent, whose examination-in- chief was recorded but the cross-examination was reserved at the request of Mr. Jai Jai Veshnu Mange Rain learned counsel for the accused. In the above circumstances, the plea of hardship cannot be considered at this stage. The next date of hearing has been fixed by the trial Court on 13-6-2006. Bailable warrants have been issued. The bail application is, therefore, rejected with the observation that if no further progress is made within four months and the delay is not caused on the part of defence, the applicant shall be at liberty to repeat the bail application.