Al Wakeelo logo

Al Wakeelo

Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty

Initializing Secure Chambers

1985 SCMR 1589

ABDUR RASHID TAJ MUHAMMAD UMARA KHAN vs FAZAL KARIM And Other

Petitioner: ABDUR RASHID TAJ MUHAMMAD UMARA KHAN VS Respondent: FAZAL KARIM And Other JUDGMENT

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan Decision Date: 1984-12-31

Full Judgment Text & Judicial Ruling

Court Name: Supreme Court of Pakistan Judge(s): N/A Title:ABDUR RASHID TAJ MUHAMMAD UMARA KHAN vs FAZAL KARIM And Other

JUDGMENT

Reported As: 1985 SCMR 1589 Result: Petitions dismissed Judgment JUDGMENT MUHAMMAD HALEEM, C.J.--In these petitions, the petitioners were ordered to be ejected from the disputed property on the ground that it was required reasonably and in good faith by the landlord for reconstruction for which all the requirements have been fulfilled. Before the Rent Controller only good faith of the landlord was challenged and evidence was led to show that the building was in good shape and that the landlord had wanted the petitioners to vacate the premises as he wanted to sell it. This plea failed and the order of ejectment was upheld by the appellate Courts in successive appeals. Here it was urged that as in one other petition against Nasrullah, the relationship of landlord and tenant was sill under dispute and until that matter was decided the ejectment order could not be effective as in that case there could not be demolition and reconstruction of the building. But this plea was not raised before the High Court, and we do not see any reason to entertain it. Even otherwise it is not a legal defence in a case for ejectment on this ground against the petitioners. It is for the landlord to manage the demolition and reconstruction, and if, at all, he is unable to do so, the provisions of the Ordinance will take care of it. These petitions are without substance, and are, accordingly, dismissed.

Related Legal Research & Directories