Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: SAJID ALI And Other VS Respondent: M/S. HINO PAK MOTORS LIMITED, KARACHI And Others
Court Name: Labour Appellate Tribunal Judge(s): Agha Ali Hyder Title: SAJID ALI And Other vs M/S. HINO PAK MOTORS LIMITED, KARACHI And Others Case No.: Appeals Nos. KAR-168 and KAR-169 of 1992 Date of Judgment:1993-09-29 Reported As: 1994 PLC 82 Result: Appeals dismissed
Judgment DECISION These two appeals from the composite order of the Labour Court NO.III dismissing the petitions under section 25-A, I.R.O. Arise in the following circumstances: The case as set up by the petitioners was that they had made a move for the formation of a trade union and the respondent whose employees they had been, apprised of this situation forthwith terminated their services verbally on the 30th of May, 1988. This had culminated in the filing of a petition. 2. The respondents in their written reply denied the averment in regard to the alleged relationship. It was stated on their behalf that the petitioners were the employees of their contractors namely Alkhair Services. 3. These petitions were dismissed by the Labour Court as the appellants I in their cross- examination had admitted their signatures on the letters of appointment and the letters of termination of service from M/s. Alkhair Services, as testified by Saeed Hamid. 4. This cuts at the very root of the case and no fault can be found with the impugned order. 5. As a result I will dismiss these appeals.