Al Wakeelo logo

Al Wakeelo

Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty

Initializing Secure Chambers

1991 SCMR 1913

SHER MUHAMMAD And 4 Others vs MUHAMMAD BOOTA And 8 Other

Petitioner: SHER MUHAMMAD And 4 Others VS Respondent: MUHAMMAD BOOTA And 8 Other

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan Decision Date: 1991-11-26

Full Judgment Text & Judicial Ruling

Court Name: Supreme Court of Pakistan Judge(s): Ali Hussain Qazilbash, Muhammad Afzal Zullah, Shafi-ur-Rehman Title: SHER MUHAMMAD And 4 Others vs MUHAMMAD BOOTA And 8 Other Case No.: Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.381 of 1989 Date of Judgment:1991-11-26 Reported As: 1991 SCMR 1913 Result: Order accordingly

Judgment ORDER The Court Associate has reported that the Power of Attorney from the respondents side in favour of the counsel is only of one person but the learned counsel has made categorical statement that he has the authority to, appear and has put in appearance for respondents No.1 to 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has no objection to it. Both the learned counsel have stated that respondents Nos.4 to 7 are pro forma and are not contesting parties nor are they any more interested in contesting the present petition. The respondents Nos.8 and 9 are represented by Mr. Muhammad Siddique, from the office of D.C.O. Faisalabad. He has appeared to assist the Court. He says that he represents the official respondents Nos.8 and 9. He and the learned counsel have stated that the case is otherwise complete for final disposal.

Related Legal Research & Directories