Legal Principle & Question Decided

Ruling Summary: This decision was rendered by the Sindh High Court, officially reported as 2025 SHC 3224. In this matter between Const. P. 937/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi - Mst. Huma Noor (Petitioner) and the Respondent, the court adjudicated key questions of statutory construction, procedural regularity, and legal precedent under Pakistani law.

Core Holding: The honorable bench evaluated governing statutory provisions and judicial authorities to establish the rights of the parties, delivering the binding reasoning set out below.

Full Judgment Text & Judicial Ruling

COURT: Sindh High Court CASE NO: Const. P. 937/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION: 2025 SHC KHI 3224 PARTIES: Mst. Huma Noor (Petitioner) ORDER DATE: 13-OCT-25 BENCH: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) A.F.R: Yes ------------------------------------------------------------ [1]

ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH AT KARACHI

Constitutional Petition No. S-937 of 2025

Date Order with signature of Judge(s)

1. For order on office objection Nos.1 to 9 and reply as at “A” 2. For hearing of CMA No.6267/2025 (Stay) 3. For hearing of main case

13.10.2025

Ms. Asma Abro advocate for the petitioner Mr. Muhammad Mohsin Mangi, Assistant PG Mr. Raza Mian, DSP (Legal-II) CPO SI Muhammad Naeem, PS Awami Colony, Karachi --------------------------------

This Court vide order dated 2 9.9.2025 issued notices to the respondents . Meanwhile, the SHO concerned was directed to ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioner in any manner of whatsoever nature and he shall take bonds from the private respondents to that effect in the sum of Rs.500,000/ - (Rupees five lac only) each. The SSP concerned was also directed to ensure safety of the petitioner. Today, in compliance of the aforesaid order, SHO concerned has submitted report dated 13.10.2025, which is taken on record. Meanwhile, learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that the parties have compromised outside the Court, therefore, she does not wish to press the instant petition in the terms that the SSP concerned may be directed to ensure safety of the petitioner. If this is the position of the case, this petition stands disposed of alongwith listed application in terms of the statement of the SHO concerned and the counsel that parties have compromised the matter outside the Court.

JUDGE

Zahid/*

Related Legal Research & Directories

• Browse all judgments from Sindh High Court
• Search Pakistani statutes: Constitution of Pakistan 1973, PPC, CrPC, CPC & Family Laws
• Analyze this case with Al Wakeelo AI Legal Assistant