Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: MUHAMMAD ANWAR and anothers VS Respondent: THE STATE
Court Name: Lahore High Court Judge(s): Muhammad Munir Khan Title: MUHAMMAD ANWAR and anothers vs THE STATE Case No.: Criminal Miscellaneous No, 281-B/BWP of 1984 Date of Judgment:1984-06-24 Reported As: 1985 P Cr. L J 1531 Result: Bail granted
Judgment ORDER ' This is an application for bail on behalf of Muhammad Anwar and Muhammad Ashiq petitioners in case under section 302/307/325/34, P.P.C. Registered at P.S. City Khanpur, District Rahimyar Khan vide F.I.R. No, 107/82. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that although the petitioners were arrested on 2- 5-1982 and two years have passed yet the trial has not concluded. The learned counsel for the State is not in a position to controvert the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners. 3. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, I find that the petitioners were arrested on 2-5- 1982, that two years have passed and the trial has not concluded so far and that the trial Court refused bail on the ground that Abdul Majid co-accused remained fugitive from process of law for sufficient long time which to my mind is not a good ground to refuse bail to the petitioners who were not at fault at all. 4. For what has been stated above, the petitioners are allowed bail on the ground of statutory delay subject to their furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs,10,000 each with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Assistant Commissioner/Duty Magistrate, Rahimyar Khan.
---
## Page 2
revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.