Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: EMPLOYEES UNION VS Respondent: HOLY FAMILY HOSPITAL, KARACHI And An Other
Court Name: Labour Appellate Tribunal Judge(s): Inamullah Khan Title: EMPLOYEES UNION vs HOLY FAMILY HOSPITAL, KARACHI And An Other Case No.: Appeal No. KAR-608 of 1973 Date of Judgment:1973-09-18 Reported As: 1975 PLC 118 Result: N/A
Judgment DECISION The learned Presiding Officer of Sind Labour Court No. V, Karachi, dismissed the application of the appellant-Union, filed under section 32 (1-A) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1959 (hereinafter called the Ordinance), on the ground that under the settlement between the parties, dated 30th October 1972, it was agreed that no fresh demand involving financial implications, direct or indirect, shall be raised during the operative period of the said settlement. The Union had pressed only two demands, namely: (1)Washermen should be provided all facilities and benefits in time with other workers. (2)Illegal deduction of Rs. 75 p.m. for 13 months from the salary of Mrs. Mybil Vaz be returned to her immediately. 2. I have heard the learned Representatives for the parties and I havej come to the conclusion that the learned Labour Court has rightly dismissed/* the application filed by the Union. The appeal is dismissed. The award' of the learned Labour Court is maintained.