Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: MEHTAB ALI VS Respondent: THE STATE
Court Name: Lahore High Court Judge(s): Muhammad Farrukh Mehmood Title: MEHTAB ALI vs THE STATE Case No.: Criminal Miscellaneous No,618-B of 2006 Date of Judgment:2005-03-20 Reported As: 2007 YLR 1277 Result: Bail granted
Judgment ORDER ' MUHAMMAD FARRUKH MAHMUD, J.---Mehtab Ali, petitioner has sought post-arrest bail in case F.I.R. No,7, registered at Police Station, Old Kotwali, Multan, on 12-1-2005, for offences under section 489-F, P.P.C. 2. According to F.I.R., the complainant gave more than Rs,74,00,000 to the petitioner as loan. Thereafter, the petitioner issued certain cheques in favour of the complainant, which bounced and eases were registered against him. The petitioner also issued Cheque No,CD8479863 in favour of the complainant, which also bounced and the matter was reported to the police. 3. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and gone through the record. It has been noticed that the amount of cheque has not been mentioned in the F.I.R. At all; perusal of the record reveals that the above mentioned cheque was issued on 15-9-2004, about three months prior to reporting of matter to the police; neither the cheque issued by the petitioner nor its attested copy is available on record of the case; and similarly not a single bank officer has been cited as witness. In these circumstances, I am inclined to admit the petitioner to bail, subject to his furnishing bail bonds, in the sum of Rupees five lacs, with one surety, in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the trial Court.
---
## Page 2
revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.