Al Wakeelo logo

Al Wakeelo

Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty

Initializing Secure Chambers

Const. P. 639/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi - Farooq A Ghaffar Through Attorney Daniyal Abbas (Petitioner) — 2025 SHC 3222

Official Citation: 2025 SHC 3222

Court / Jurisdiction: Sindh High Court

Petitioner: Const. P. 639/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi - Farooq A Ghaffar Through Attorney Daniyal Abbas (Petitioner)

Legal Principle & Question Decided

Ruling Summary: This decision was rendered by the Sindh High Court, officially reported as 2025 SHC 3222. In this matter between Const. P. 639/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi - Farooq A Ghaffar Through Attorney Daniyal Abbas (Petitioner) and the Respondent, the court adjudicated key questions of statutory construction, procedural regularity, and legal precedent under Pakistani law.

Core Holding: The honorable bench evaluated governing statutory provisions and judicial authorities to establish the rights of the parties, delivering the binding reasoning set out below.

Full Judgment Text & Judicial Ruling

COURT: Sindh High Court CASE NO: Const. P. 639/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION: 2025 SHC KHI 3222 PARTIES: Farooq A Ghaffar Through Attorney Daniyal Abbas (Petitioner) ORDER DATE: 13-OCT-25 BENCH: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) A.F.R: Yes ------------------------------------------------------------ [1]

ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH AT KARACHI

Constitutional Petition No. S-639 of 2025

Date Order with signature of Judge(s)

1. For order on office objection Nos.1 to 12 alongwith reply as at “A” 2. For hearing of CMA No.5107/2025 (Stay) 3. For hearing of main case

13.10.2025

Syed Zaeem Haider advocate for the petitioner Mr. Yar Muhammad advocate SI Mahmood, PS Gabol Town, Karachi Mr. Bashar Hussain, Deputy Director, SMTA --------------------------------

It is inter alia contended that the petitione r is the owner of plot No.L -2 admeasuring 6050 square yards, Block -22 Federal B. Industrial Area, Karachi. Learned counsel states that the petitioner has been issued an approved building plan dated 26.8.2020 which shows that his access to the property is f rom the 200 feet vide road. He further contended that the respondents are constructing a Bus Station in front of his property on such 200 feet vide road under the Peoples Bus Service Program which is being done without an Environment Impact Assessment and shall curtail the access to this property. This Court vide order dated 31.7.2025 i ssued notices to the respondents with directions to appear and assist this Court, meanwhile, they were restrained from carrying out construction of the bus station in front of the subject property of the petitioner. Today, the SHO concerned has submitted report, wherein he has stated that they will act strictly in accordance with law. In view of above position, the official respondents are directed not to cause any sort of har assment to the petitioner and shall act strictly in accordance with law. So far as the construction of the bus station in front of the property of the petitioner is concerned, the same shall be constructed atleast 30 feet away from the plot of the petitioner. Petition stands disposed of in the above terms alongwith listed / pending application(s).

JUDGE

Zahid/*

Related Legal Research & Directories