Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: MUHAMMAD IMRAN VS Respondent: THE STATE
Court Name: Lahore High Court Judge(s): Khawaja Muhammad Sharif Title: MUHAMMAD IMRAN vs THE STATE Case No.: Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1385-B of 2003 Date of Judgment:2003-03-27 Reported As: 2003 YLR 1735 Result: Bail granted
Judgment ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as far as, petitioner is concerned, only simple injury on the person of Younis injured P.W. Is attributed to him, that including the petitioner two other co- accused were also injured in this case and their injuries were suppressed by the prosecution, that after the investigation, it had been ordered by the Investigating Officer that complainant party should also be challaned in this case and that case of the petitioner is of further inquiry falling under subsection (2) of section 497, Cr.P.C. 2. On the other hand, learned counsel for the complainant submits that after the occurrence complainant party was so much worried and took the deceased in an injured condition to the General Hospital, Lahore, that in fact petitioner was not injured during the occurrence, that injuries on the person of the petitioner are self-suffered and the offence alleged against him falls within the ambit of section 497(1), Cr.P.C. 3. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. In the instant case, three persons from the side of the petitioner including the petitioner were injured and their injuries were suppressed by the prosecution. The injury attributed to the petitioner to the injured P.W. Namely, Younis is simple in nature S.-I. Present in Court submits that an order has been passed by the Investigating Officer that a cross-version should also be registered against the complainant party. As the petitioner has not touched the deceased and moreover from the petitioner side including the petitioner three persons were also injured and their injuries were suppressed by the prosecution, this petition is accepted. Petitioner is allowed bail subject to furnishing bail bonds to the tune of Rs.50,000 (fifty thousand) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of trial Court.