Full Judgment Text & Judicial Ruling

2011 P T D (Trib

2011 P T D (Trib.) 731

[Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal of Pakistan]

Before Munsif Khan Minhas, Judicial Member

COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX, FAISALABAD

Versus

Messrs SUN RISE FOOD INDUSTRY, FAISALABAD

S.T.A. No.1752/LB of 2009, decided on 11th December, 2010.

Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)---

----S. 11(2)---Assessment of tax---Agreement---Claim of input tax was restricted to the extent of 20% of the value of exported goods and disallow the balance---First Appellate Authority's direction to allow adjustment of input tax as claim of registered person was based on consumption of packing material in exports---Department contended that the agreement was executed between the Collector and Association of Confectionery voluntarily and was binding upon the .contracting parties; and claim of input adjustment, being in excess of 20% limit had been rightly disallowed---Registered person contended that agreement relied upon was not of binding nature because it was not reduced into a statutory instrument---Validity---Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the department; and directed the concerned officer to allow the adjustment of input tax to the registered person because the same could not be denied on the basis of an agreement which was enforceable under the law.

Messrs Crescent Re-rolling Mills's case 2005 PTD 2436; Messrs Mehmood and Co. v. Assistant Collector Sales Tax Lahore and others 2005 PTD 72 and 2007 PTD 47 rel.

Faisal Asghar, D.R. for Appellant.

Khubaib Ahmad for Respondent.

ORDER

MUNSIF KHAN MINHAS (JUDICIAL MEMBER).---This appeal has been filed by the Revenue against the order of the Collector(Appeals) Faisalabad, dated 18-6-2008. The revenue feels aggrieved by the observation of the Collector (Appeals) to the effect that the Assistant Collector (Refund) Sales Tax and Federal Excise, Faisalabad was not justified to restrict the claim of input tax made by the registered person to the extent of 20% of the value of the exported goods and disallow the balance.

2. The facts of the case, in brief, are that the registered person, a private limited company is engaged in the business of manufacturing and export of confectionery items. Through a show-cause notice dated 28-11-2007 the Assistant Collector Sales Tax and Federal Excise, Faisalabad, confronted the registered person with the disallowance of input tax of Rs.523,772 claimed during the tax period April, 2007. At the adjudication stage, the registered person produced evidence regarding the admissibility of adjustment of input tax and on its basis the learned adjudicating officer, accepted the claim of the registered person excepting an amount of Rs.523,772 which was held to be inadmissible. Being aggrieved, the registered person preferred appeal before the Collector (Appeals) Faisalabad, who vide his Order No.995 of 2008 dated 19-4-2008 directed to allow the adjustment of input tax of A Rs.523,772 as the claim of the registered person was based on consumption of packing material in exports. Now the Revenue feeling dissatisfied by the direction of the Collector (Appeals) has come up in appeal before us.

3. The thrust of the argument of the learned DR was on the agreement between the Collector of Sales Tax Faisalabad, and Association of Confectionery Exporters referred to above. He contended that the agreement was executed between the Collector and Association of Confectionery voluntarily and was binding upon the contracting parties. He argued that the claim of input adjustment, being in excess of the said 20% limit had been rightly disallowed by the Assistant Collector (Refund). The learned AR of the registered person, on the other hand, contended that the agreement relied upon by the Assistant Collector was not of binding nature because it was not reduced into a statutory instrument. To fortify his contention tie learned AR of the registered person referred to the judgment of the Lahore High Court, Lahore in the case of Messrs Crescent Re-rolling Mils reported as 2005 PTD 2436 wherein the honourable High Court held:--

"There is no estoppel against law. The agreement between the parties having never been reduced in the form of a statutory instrument, any person affected by the same could very well refuse to abide by such agreement even after having initially accepted the same. An association of taxpayers is different from a collective bargain agent which is authorized b law to negotiate and bargain on behalf of the labourers which it represents. An association of taxpayers has no role to play under the Sales Tax Act nor any of the rules framed thereunder."

The learned representative also referred to the cases of Messrs Mehmood and Co. v. Assistant Collector Sales Tax Lahore and others reported as 2005 PTD 72 and 2007 PTD 47 wherein similar finding was recorded by the honourable Lahore High Court, Lahore.

4. In view of the settled legal position discussed in the above-quoted cases, we feel inclined to agree with the learned AR of the registered person and dismiss the appeal filed by the Revenue. Accordingly, we direct the concerned officer to allow the adjustment of input tax of Rs.58,317 to the registered person because the same cannot be denied on the basis of an agreement which is enforceable under the law.

5. The departmental appeal fails.

C.M.A./22/Tax(Trib.) Appeal dismissed.

Related Legal Research & Directories

• Browse all judgments from INLAND REVENUE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL OF PAKISTAN
• Search Pakistani statutes: Constitution of Pakistan 1973, PPC, CrPC, CPC & Family Laws
• Analyze this case with Al Wakeelo AI Legal Assistant