Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: MUHAMMAD SHARIF VS Respondent: AMANULLAH
Court Name: Lahore High Court Judge(s): Sh. Riaz Ahmad Title: MUHAMMAD SHARIF vs AMANULLAH Case No.: Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1796/13 of 1989, Date of Judgment:1989-06-18 Reported As: 1989 MLD 4085 Result: Petition dismissed
Judgment ORDER According to the statements of two witnesses recorded under section 161, Cr.P.C., the respondent was shown to be empty-handed and no part was assigned to him in the F.I.R. That is why, the respondent was allowed bail by the learned Additional Sessions Judge. 2. In support of this petition seeking cancellation of bail allowed to the respondent it is contended, that the respondent is trying to suborn the witnesses, and to substantiate the same, affidavits of some witnesses have been filed. To rebut the same, counter-affidavits have also been filed. Police was not approached with regard to the threats alleged to have been advanced by the respondent. In this view of the matter, I am not inclined to interfere with the grant of bail allowed to the respondent. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. M.Y.H./M-1529/L Petition dismissed