Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: ALTAF AHMED VS Respondent: KARACHI PORT TRUSTHonorable Justice Nasir Aslam ZahidAbdul Sattar G. Shaikh,S. Hamid Hussain
1991 P L C (C
1991 P L C (C.S.) 511
[Karachi High Court]
Before Nasir Aslam Zahid and Salahuddin Mirza, JJ
ALTAF AHMED
Versus
KARACHI PORT TRUST through its Chairman and 4 others
Constitutional Petition No. 1377 and Miscellaneous Application No. 3117 of 1990, decided on 20th December, 1990.
Constitution of Pakistan (1973)---
----Art. 199---Constitutional petition---During hearing of petition, respondent submitted that neither any action had been taken against petitioner by respondent nor any adverse action against him was contemplated---Respondent further submitted that in case any action was proposed to be taken against petitioner, such action would be taken strictly in accordance with law---Petitioner being satisfied with submissions made by respondent, petition stood dismissed as withdrawn.
Abdul Sattar G. Shaikh for Petitioner.
S. Hamid Hussain for Respondents Nos. 1 and 2 (pursuant to Notice).
ORDER
NASIR ASLAM ZAHID, J.---This petition has been admitted to regular hearing. When it came up before this Court on G-12-1990 this Court directed that comments be called from respondents Nos. 1 and 3 within 3 weeks. However, notice was issued to the respondents of the application for interim relief. Mr. S. Hamid Hussain, learned counsel appearing for KPT (respondent No. 2) submits that neither any action has been taken against the petitioner by KPT nor, at this stage, any adverse action against the petitioner is contemplated. It is further submitted by Mr. S. Hamid Hussain that, in case any action is proposed to be taken against the petitioner, such action will be taken strictly according to the rules. Mr. S. Hamid Hussain adds that perusal of the memo. of the petition would show that not a single allegation has been made against the KPT and that there is also no averment, directly or indirectly, that KPT is taking any action for removal of the petitioner from the service of KPT. Mr. Abdul Sattar G. Shaikh, learned counsel for the petitioner is satisfied with the submission made by Mr. Hamid Hussain learned counsel for respondent and as such he does not press Petition No. 1377/90, which stands dismissed as withdrawn.
The two Miscellaneous Applications have become infructuous.
H.B.T./1027/K Petition dismissed.