Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX/WEALTH TAX, LAHORE, ZONE-B, LAHORE VS Respondent: FAROOQ AHMED
Court Name: Lahore High Court Judge(s): Nasim Sikandar, Mansoor Ahmed Title:COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX/WEALTH TAX, LAHORE, ZONE-B, LAHORE vs
FAROOQ AHMED Case No.: C.T.R. No.66 of 1997 Date of Judgment:2001-05-08 Reported As: 2001 PTD 2876 Result: Reference answered Judgment ORDER At the instance of the Revenue Lahore Bench .Of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has framed the following question of law for our consideration and answer: "Whether in the facts and the circumstances of the case, the I.T.AT. Was right in holding that the export rebate already allowed to the Firm shall also be allowed to the partners of the same Firm." 2. Learned counsel for the Revenue at the outset agrees that an affirmative answer to similar questions by a Division Bench of the Sindh High. Court was subsequently maintained by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in Re: Commissioner of InCome-tax v. Nasir Ali and others reported as 1999 PTD 1173. 3. That being so the answer to the question in accordance with the ratio settled by the Supreme Court of Pakistan is returned in the affirmative. .