Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Official Citation: 2024 SHC 1429
Court / Jurisdiction: Sindh High Court
Petitioner: Cr.Bail 1429/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi - MUHAMMAD SHAHBAZ S/O UMAR U DIN (Applicant)
Ruling Summary: This decision was rendered by the Sindh High Court, officially reported as 2024 SHC 1429. In this matter between Cr.Bail 1429/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi - MUHAMMAD SHAHBAZ S/O UMAR U DIN (Applicant) and the Respondent, the court adjudicated key questions of statutory construction, procedural regularity, and legal precedent under Pakistani law.
Core Holding: The honorable bench evaluated governing statutory provisions and judicial authorities to establish the rights of the parties, delivering the binding reasoning set out below.
COURT: Sindh High Court CASE NO: Cr.Bail 1429/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION: 2024 SHC KHI 567 PARTIES: MUHAMMAD SHAHBAZ S/O UMAR U DIN (Applicant) ORDER DATE: 21-AUG-24 BENCH: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author) A.F.R: Yes ------------------------------------------------------------ Page 1 of 2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH, KARACHI
Criminal Bail Application No. 1429 of 2024
__________________________________________________________________ Date Order with signature of Judge
Applicant : through Mr. Shams-ul-Hadi, Advocate Muhammad Shahbaz Khan, Advocates son of Umar-u-Din
The State : Through Mr. Shoaib Safdar, Assistant Prosecutor General, Sindh a/w SIP Muhammad Dilawar of P.S Korangi, Karachi
Date of hearing : 21.08.2024
Date of order : 21.08.2024
O R D E R
Muhammad Saleem Jessar, J: - Through this bail application, applicant Muhammad Shahbaz seeks his release on post arrest bail in Crime No. 252 of 202 3 of P.S Korangi, Karachi, for the offence punishable under Section 23(i)A of Sindh Arms Act, 2013 . The applicant filed bail plea before the trial Court which by means of order dated 06.04.2024 was declined; hence, instant bail application has been maintained.
2. Since the facts of the prosecution case are already mentioned in the FIR, which is annexed with the C ourt file, therefore, there is no need to reproduce the same.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant simply argued that it is an offshoot of main case in which applicant has already been granted bail by this Court today viz. 21.08.2024; hence, deserves to be admitted to bail in this case also.
4. On the other hand, learned Assistant P.G, Sindh appearing for the State, oppose d the bail application on the ground that no ill -will or any
Page 2 of 2
animosity has been urged against the police for foisting weapon against t he applicant, as claimed by the defense.
5. Heard and perused record . No doubt, the applicant has failed to bring on record any ill -will or animosity on the part of police for arraying him in this case falsely. Admittedly, it is an offshoot of main case viz. Crime No.250 of 2023 registered with P.S Korangi, Karachi, for offences punishable under Section 395, 397, 353, 324 & 186 PPC, in which applicant has been granted bail by this Court today viz. 21.08.2024 vide Criminal Bail Application No.1428 of 2024. It being an offshoot of main case, the applicant deserves to be admitted to bail in this case also. As far as, punishment provided by the law, is concerned, the legislature itself has left it upon discretion of the Court to determine quantum of the senten ce after recording evidence of the prosecution witnesses. In this regard, I am fortified with dicta laid down by learned Bench of this Court in case of AYAZ ALI Versus THE STATE (PLD 2014 Sindh 282).
6. In the circumstances and in view of above legal pos ition, applicant has made out a good prima facie case of further inquiry within meaning of subsection (2) to section 497 Cr.P.C. Consequently, b y a short order dated 21.08.2024, instant bail application was allowed; whereby, applicant Muhammad Shahbaz son of Umar -u-Din was directed to be released on bail subject to furnishing his solvent surety in the sum of Rs. 30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousands Only) and PR Bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned trial Court.
7. It may be pertinent to mentio n here that the observation(s) made hereinabove is/are tentative in nature and shall not prejudice the case of either party during trial. However, if the applicant is found misusing the concession of bail, learned trial Court would be competent to proceed against him as well his surety, according to law.
These are the reasons of said short order.
JUDGE Zulfiqar/P.A