Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: MUHAMMAD IQBAL HAIDRI VS Respondent: DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, JHANG
1988 S C M R 1968
1988 S C M R 1968
Present: Ghulam Mujaddid Mirza and Saad Saood Jan, JJ
MUHAMMAD IQBAL HAIDRI‑‑Petitioner
versus
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, JHANG and others‑‑Respondents
Civil Petition No.102 of 1982, decided on 17th July, 1988.
(From the judgment of Punjab Service Tribunal dated 6‑12‑1981 in Appeal No.755/931 of 1980).
Punjab Civil Servants Act (VIII. of 1974)‑‑
‑‑‑Ss.10 & 15‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 212 (3)‑‑Termination of service‑‑Irresponsible civil servant‑‑Dismissal of appeal by Service Tribunal against termination of service, challenged‑‑Petitioner charged with negligence in performance of his duty‑‑Authority found justified in arriving at conclusion that in case of negligence and. carelessness, irresponsible Civil Servants were not required to continue in service to earn a bad name for their miserable performance‑‑Impugned judgment having no error of law and there being no other substantial point requiring examination, leave to appeal refused.
M.Nawaz Kasuri, Advocate Supreme Court and Tanvir Ahmad Sheikh, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner. Nemo for Respondents.
Date of hearing: 17th July, 1988.
ORDER
GHULAM MUJADDID MIRZA, J.‑‑Muhammad Iqbal Haidri, ex‑Junior Clerk/Reader to Naib‑Tehsildar Rabwah has filed this petition for special leave to appeal against the judgment of Punjab Service Tribunal dated 6‑12‑1981 whereby his appeal against his termination from service on the charge of failure to consign the decided cases to record room was dismissed.
We find the following observation in the impugned judgment:---‑
"The learned Deputy Commissioner could not ignore this important aspect of the case and was fully justified in arriving at the conclusion that in case of negligence and carelessness irresponsible Civil Servants were not required to continue in service to earn a bad name for their miserable performance."
We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. He was unable to meet the aforesaid observation.
As there is no error of law or other substantial point which needs examination, leave is declined. The petition is accordingly dismissed.
M.I./M‑566/S Petition dismissed.