Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: ABDUL HAKIM VS Respondent: Messrs ABDUL RAHMAN, CONTRACTOR, ABDULLAH INDUSTRIES
Court Name: Labour Appellate Tribunal Judge(s): Agha Ali Hyder Title:ABDUL HAKIM vs Messrs ABDUL RAHMAN, CONTRACTOR, ABDULLAH
INDUSTRIES Case No.: Appeal No, KAR-574 of 1991 Date of Judgment:1992-01-26 Reported As: 1992 PLC 538 Result: Appeal dismissed Judgment DECISION ' The appellant and some other workers also had filed grievance petitions against Abdullah Industries and had impleaded the present respondent also therein. That grievance petition had been dismissed by the Labour Court on the ground that no grievance notice had been given to the present respondent at all but only to M/s. Abdullah Industries who was not their employer. The petition had been dismissed by order, dated 2nd July, 1991. It was thereafter that the fresh grievance procedure was adopted by the appellant and the other workers which was later on followed by grievance application before the learned Labour Court. 2. Wrong advice tendered to the appellant would not be a ground to extend the period of limitation. ' Under the circumstances the petition has been rightly dismissed by the Labour Court and no interference is called for. I will therefore dismiss the appeal summarily.