Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Official Citation: 2024 SHC 1156
Court / Jurisdiction: Sindh High Court
Year of Decision: 2024
Decision Date: 2024-10-09
Parties: Muhamad Umer vs The State
Ruling Summary: This decision was rendered by the Sindh High Court on 2024-10-09, officially reported as 2024 SHC 1156. In this matter between Muhamad Umer and The State, the court adjudicated key questions of statutory construction, procedural regularity, and legal precedent under Pakistani law.
Core Holding: The honorable bench evaluated governing statutory provisions and judicial authorities to establish the rights of the parties, delivering the binding reasoning set out below.
Case cited as 2024SHC1156
Court Name: Sindh High Court Judge(s): Adnan-ul-Karim Memon Title: Muhamad Umer vs The State Case No.: Criminal Misc. Application No. S-427 of 2024 Date of Judgment:2024-10-09 Reported As: 2024 SHC 1156 Result: Application Disposed of
Judgment
ORDER Adnan-ul-Karim M em on, J. Through this Criminal Miscellaneous Application, the applicant Muhammad Umer Kunbhar had impugned the order dated 29-05-2024 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I/Ex-Officio Justice of Peace, Mirpurkhas, whereby his Criminal Miscellaneous Application No.747/2024 seeking for registration of FIR was dismissed. 2. This Court vide order dated 28-09-2024 disposed of the instant application with a direction to DIG Mirpurkhas to conduct the inquiry to ascertain the factual position of the case by hearing the parties; however, no compliance report was submitted and again another order dated 02-10-2024 was passed with direction to DIGP Mirpurkhas to submit a compliance report. Today, DIGP Mirpurkhas has submitted a compliance report. At this stage, both the parties agreed to the disposal of the contempt application in the term that SHO shall take a personal bond from the private respondents in the sum of Rs.10,00,000/- (PKR. one million) from each respondent to the effect that no harassm ent shall be caused to the applicant. If they fail to furnish the bond for the aforesaid purpose, DIGP shall take immediate action in terms of paragraph 05 of the compliance report. 3. This contempt/listed application is disposed of in the above terms.
---
## Page 2
revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.