Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: MUHAMMAD AWAIS SHAHID VS Respondent: PUNJAB GOVERNMENT
Court Name: Punjab Service Tribunal Judge(s): Sardar Abdul Jabbar Khan, Abdul Hameed Chaudhry, Mian Faiz Karim Title: MUHAMMAD AWAIS SHAHID vs PUNJAB GOVERNMENT Case No.: Case No, 321 of 1981 Date of Judgment:1984-06-18 Reported As: 1985 PLC (C.S.) 787 Result: Application accordingly
JUDGMENT
JUDGMENT ' S. ABDUL JABBAR KHAN (CHAIRMAN).-.--III case of Muhttmmad Await Shahid, Ex-Civil Judge, has moved an application under sections 47, 151 and 21 R-32, C. P. C. In which he has prayed that the judgment of this Tribunal be implemented. As in the said judgment it was observed as under :- "In the light of the above discussion we direct the respondent to consider the case of the appellant for promotion to the past of Additional District and Session Judge and to N. P. S. 18 from the date from which his next junior Civil Judge was so promoted and to take independent decision after taking into consideration all pros and cons of his case." ' This judgment was delivered when the appellant was in service. ' The appellant has since been removed from service and his appeal against the said removal is also pending before this Tribunal. ' In compliance to this Judgment, the case of the appellant was considered on 25th February, 1984 by Provincial Selection Board in its meeting which was held on the same date. The Provincial Selection Board has not approved the appellant for promotion as Additional District and Sessions Judge w. e. f. 27th September, 1975. This has been further approved by the M. L. A./Governor. ' The grievance of the appellant is that he should be intimated the reasons for this decision of the Governor and this Tribunal should call upon the Provincial Selection Board to give the reasons for their said decision. We are afraid that we cannot go into further details of this case when we find that the case of the appellant was considered but not approved, therefor the implementation of the judgment of this Tribunal has been made. ' In the light of the above we dispose of the . The petitioner can seek remedy if any before the proper forum.