Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: Board Of Revenue HUMAYUN VS Respondent: THE STATE
Court Name: Board of Revenue Judge(s): Maqbool Ahmad Sheikh Title: Board Of Revenue HUMAYUN vs THE STATE Case No.: Review No.51 of 1986 Date of Judgment:1986-02-24 Reported As: 1986 CLC 2147 Result: petition dismissed
Judgment ORDER This review has been moved by the petitioner Humayun under section 8 of the West Pakistan Board of Revenue Act against orders of my learned predecessor passed in R . 0. R . No. 689 of 1984 under which his revision was dismissed on 1-4-1984. 2. The review petition has been heard on the preliminary issue of limitation. In the application under section 5 of the Limitation Act in an attempt to seek condonation of delay of 588 days it has been pleaded that the time in excess of the limitation of 90 days was spent in seeking the correction of entries of register Girdawari. I am afraid this plea cannot be accepted as a valid explanation for the condonation of delay. Since, the order under review was passed in the presence of p the petitioner, the review could have been preferred only within the prescribed period of 90 days. The plea for condonation is totally irrelevant and is rejected as such. The review petition is accordingly