Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: GHULAM SABIR VS Respondent: THE STATE-
Court Name: Lahore High Court Judge(s): Sh. Riaz Ahmad Title: GHULAM SABIR vs THE STATE- Case No.: Criminal Miscellaneous No. 767/13 Date of Judgment:1987-03-08 Reported As: 1987 P Cr. L J 1829 Result: Petition dismissed
Judgment ORDER No doubt, that in the F.I.R. None is named as culprit, but in course of investigation the evidence collected against the petitioner consists of extra judicial confession and the recovery of blood- stained weapon of offence and blood-stained clothes of the petitioner. It is stated by the Investigating Officer that the weapon of offence and the clothes of the petitioner were opined to be stained with human blood. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn my attention to the affidavit of the complainant exonerating the petitioner. Unfortunately the complainant cannot exonerate the petitioner because it is an un--witnessed crime. It will all depend upon the appraisal of evidence by the trial Court. Accordingly, this petition has no merit and is dismissed. 3. Learned Sessions Judge, Faisalabad is directed to submit a report to this Court as to when the trial is likely to commence. The report should reach this Court within one week.