Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: GHULAM NABI VS Respondent: THE STATE-
Court Name: Lahore High Court Judge(s): Muhammad Munir Khan Title: GHULAM NABI vs THE STATE- Case No.: Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1041-B/BWP of 1982 Date of Judgment:1987-10-24 Reported As: 1987 P Cr. L J 630 Result: Bail granted
Judgment ORDER This is an application for bail on behalf of Ghulam Nabi petitioner in a case under section 16/10(2) of the Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979, registered at P.S. Faqirwali, vide F.I.R. No. 119 of 1982. 2. The prosecution case is that the petitioner abducted Mst. Hafeez Begum and thereafter, continued committing Zina with her. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is a delay of 3 years in lodging the F.I.R. And that Mst. Hafeez Begum was the legally-wedded wife of the petitioner. As against this, the learned counsel for the State assisted by the learned counsel for the complainant submits that Mst. Hafeez Begum was the wife of the complainant who having not divorced her, the petitioner has been committing Zina, punishable under section 10 of the Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979 and as such she is not entitled to the concession of bail. 4. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, I find that the F.I.R. Has been lodged after 3 years. Mst. Hafeez Begum having been challaned, there is no direct evidence of the commission of Zina on record. In these circumstances, I am of the opinion that the question of the guilt of the petitioner requires further enquiry. He is allowed bail in the sum of Rs.10,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of A . C ., Haroonabad.