Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: MUHAMMAD AFZAL BADAMI VS Respondent: THE STATE
Court Name: Sindh High Court Judge(s): Muhammad Roshan Essani, Muhammad Ashraf Leghari Title: MUHAMMAD AFZAL BADAMI vs THE STATE Case No.: Criminal Revision Application No, 117 2001 Date of Judgment:2001-09-05 Reported As: 2002 YLR 237 Result: Revision petition accepted
Judgment ORDER ' The applicant/accused was granted bail by the trial Court in the sum of Rs,13,00,000 and P.R. Bond in the like amount and by this application the applicant/accused has sought reduction of the amount of surety. It is contended that in all there are four accused in the matter and actual beneficiary is absconding. He states that if the culpability of the applicant/accused in the commission of offence is prima facie, established even then he will be responsible to the extent of 1/4th amount . ' Learned Deputy Attorney-General concedes to the arguments of the learned counsel for the applicant / accused. 'Looking towards the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case amount of surety is reduced from Rs,13,00,000 (Rupees thirteen lacs) to Rs,5,00,000 (Rupees five lacs) and P.R Bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. Revision