Al Wakeelo logo

Al Wakeelo

Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty

Initializing Secure Chambers

1998 PLC 389

Messrs BAWANY SUGAR MILLS LTD. vs MUHAMMAD SHARIF and others

Petitioner: Messrs BAWANY SUGAR MILLS LTD. VS Respondent: MUHAMMAD SHARIF and others

Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Decision Date: 1996-12-22

Full Judgment Text & Judicial Ruling

Court Name: Labour Appellate Tribunal Judge(s): Mushtaq Ali Kazi Title: Messrs BAWANY SUGAR MILLS LTD. vs MUHAMMAD SHARIF and others Case No.:Application in , HYD-494 of 1996, HYD-495 of 1996, HYD-496 of 1996, HYD-

497 of 1996, HYD-498 of 1996 and , Appeal No, HYD-503 of 1996 Date of Judgment:1996-12-22 Reported As: 1998 PLC 389 Result: Application dismissed Judgment DECISION ' These are five connected applications for re-hearing. There were in all seven appeals of similar nature by Bawany Sugar Mills against their workers. Two of the workers were served while the remaining five workers could not be served personally for want of detailed address. Service was, therefore, ordered by publication. The notice was published in Urdu daily Qaumi Akhbar Publication from Karachi. The matter was then heard and disposed of. A Constitutional petition against the decision is said to have been preferred before the Humble High Court of Sindh and the matter is said to be pending and has not so far been heard in that Court. During the pendency of the petition, this application has again been filed before the Labour Appellate Tribunal for re-hearing. There is no provision in the I.R.O. For re-hearing a decided matter, especially when the matter is now subjudice before the High Court. 2. This application for re-hearing is, therefore, dismissed in liming

Related Legal Research & Directories