Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: MUHAMMAD AIES ABID VS Respondent: PROVINCE OF THE PUNJAB
2000 P L C (C
2000 P L C (C.S.) 1105
[Service Tribunal. Punjab]
Before Abdul Hafeez Cheema, Chairman
MUHAMMAD AIES ABID
versus
PROVINCE OF THE PUNJAB through Secretary, Health, Department and 3 others
Appeal No.991 of 1999, decided on 5th April, 2000.
Civil service‑‑‑
‑‑‑‑ Advance increment‑‑‑Entitlement‑‑‑Civil servant was serving with the Health Department as Rural Health Inspector and initial prescribed qualification for this post was Matric with 1‑1/2 years' Diploma in Rural Health Inspector Course‑‑‑Civil servant during course of his employment had improved his qualification and passed F.A.., B.A. and M.A. Examinations‑‑ Civil servant in view ‑of the improvement in qualification claimed six advance increments in terms of Pay Revision Rules of Finance Department‑‑ Authority denied claim of civil servant contending that post of civil servant being technical one, improvement of qualifications in Arts subjects would not entitle him to advance increments as even M.A. (Punjabi) qualification was irrelevant in relevant field of civil servant‑‑‑Duties of civil servant according to job description were multifarious‑‑‑Civil servant was technician and had to perform curative work under supervision of Medical Officer‑‑‑ Acquisition of knowledge of Arabic up to B.A. and Punjabi up to M.A. level could not be described an advancement of knowledge in relevant field‑‑ Higher qualification acquired by civil servant being not related to relevant field of civil servant, he was rightly declined increments claimed by him.
Faiz Ahmad v. Chief Engineer, Punjab Highway Department Appeal No. 1776 of 1998 ref.
Ch. Aziz Ahmad Sbami for Appellant. Ch. Manzoor Hussain, D.A. for Respondents.
Date of hearing: 5th April, 2000.
JUDGMENT
1. The appellant is serving the Health Department as Rural Health Inspector, Rural Health Centre, Kotla Khalwan, Teshi Safdarabad, District Sheikhupura. The initial prescribed qualification for the post is Matric with 1‑1/2 years, Diploma in Rural Health Inspector Course. During the course of his employment he improved his qualification and passed F.A., B.A. and M.A. Examinations. He, therefore, requested the department to grant him 6 advance increments in terms of Pay Revision Rules of the Finance Department. In spite of this repeated requests, the department failed to meet his legitimate demand which obliged him to file this appeal.
2. The department have refuted the assertions of the appellant contending inter alia that the post of Instructor is technical one, as such, the improvement of qualification as F.A., B.A.. (Arabic) and M.A. (Punjabi) would‑not entitle him to advance increments as they are not in the relevant field.
3. Arguments have been heard and record has been gone through.
4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant that the appellant performs general type of duties and advancement in educational qualification would ensure better performance of his duties in public interest, as such, he was lawfully entitled to increments claimed by him.
5. Learned D.A., on the other hand, has argued that the department had rightly declined to meet the request of the appellant as higher qualification acquired by him does not relate to the relevant field.
6. Duties of Rural Health Inspector, according to the job description in the relevant rules (pages 29, 30, 31 and 32) are multifarious. He is a technician who is required to treat common and ordinary ailments under the supervision of Medical Officer and is also supposed to perform curative work which is invariably done by Dispensers arid Dressers and so also the work done by the Sanitary Inspectors, Malaria Inspectors and Vaccinatorsetc and besides this, he is to impart education to the villagers and number of other institutions at the lower level. The gamut of his duties described in relevant document shows that he is totally a technical officer, as such, acquisition of knowledge Arabic up to B.A. and Punjabi up to M.A. cannot be described as an advancement of knowledge in the relevant field.
7. In Faiz Ahmad v. Chief Engineer, Punjab Highway Department (Appeal No. 1776 of 1998), this Tribunal declined to allow advance increments to a technical officer who had acquired higher qualification in Arts and held that the qualification acquired by him did not relate to his field. The appellant challenged the decision of this Tribunal in Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.838‑L of 1999 (Annexure "A" with the comments) before Hon'ble Supreme Court. The decision of the Tribunal was upheld by the Hon'ble Supreme Court.
8. In this view of the matter, this appeal seems to have no merit and is hereby dismissed.
H.B.T./8/P(Sr. Trib.) Appeal dismissed.