Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: MUHAMMAD SALEH ALIAS PATHANA VS Respondent: THE STATE
1992 M L D 1854
1992 M L D 1854
[Lahore]
Before Ijaz Nisar, J
MUHAMMAD SALEH alias PATHANA‑‑‑Petitioner
versus
THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
Crl. M. No.705‑B of 1992, decided on 21st March, 1992.
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑
‑‑‑‑S.497‑‑‑West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), S.13‑‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑‑Accused was behind the bars since about six months and admittedly there was no public witness to the alleged recovery‑‑‑Accused was admitted to bail in circumstances.
Shah Ahmad Khan Baloch for Petitioner.
Akhtar Masood Khan for the State.
ORDER
Muhammad Saleh petitioner was arrested on 7‑9‑1991 on the allegation of possessing an unlicenced 7 m.m. rifle.
2. It is contended that the case is based on false allegations and except for police, there is no other public witness to the alleged recovery.
3. The petitioner is behind the bars since about 6 months. Admittedly, there is no public witness to the alleged recovery. I, therefore, admit him to bail in the sum of Rs.15,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of A.C. Kharian.
N.H.Q./M‑320/L Bail allowed.