Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: MURAMMADNAWAZ VS Respondent: THE STATE
1992 M L D 1851
1992 M L D 1851
[Lahore]
Before Sh. Riaz Ahmad, J
MURAMMADNAWAZ ‑‑‑ Petitioner
versus
THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
Crl. Misc. 181‑B of 1992, decided on 12th February, 1992.
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑
‑‑‑‑S.497(2)‑‑‑Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), S.10/18‑‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.354‑‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑‑Initially challan against accused was submitted under S.10/18 of the Ordinance but on reinvestigation no such offence was found to have been made out against him and supplementary challan had been submitted against accused under W4, P.P.C.‑‑‑Case against accused was, thus, of further inquiry‑‑‑Accused was admitted to bail in circumstances.
Mian Muhammad Akram Ranjha for Petitioner.
M. Saleem Shad for the State.
ORDER
A.S.I. states that initially challan against the petitioner was submitted under section 10/18 of the Hudood Ordinance, but on the application moved by the petitioner, the case was reinvestigated by the A.S.P., and now a supplementary challan has been submitted under section 354, P.P.C. as no case under section 10/18 of the Hudood Ordinance was made out.
2. In this view of the matter, I am of the view that it is a case of further! enquiry and is covered by section 497(2), Cr.P.C., therefore, the petitioner is admitted to bail provided he furnishes bail bonds in the sum of Rs. fifty thousand with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of Assistant Commissioner Bhalwal.
N.H.Q./M‑321/L Bail allowed.