Al Wakeelo logo

Al Wakeelo

Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty

Initializing Secure Chambers

2004 PLC 103

QUETTA DISTILERY WORKERS UNION, QUETTA, and others vs REGISTRAR TRADE

Petitioner: QUETTA DISTILERY WORKERS UNION, QUETTA, and others VS Respondent: REGISTRAR TRADE UNION. BALOCHISTAN, LABOUR DIRECTORATE. QUETTA and another

Court: Balochistan High Court Decision Date: 2003-08-20

Full Judgment Text & Judicial Ruling

Court Name: Balochistan High Court Judge(s): Muhammad Nadir Khan Title:QUETTA DISTILERY WORKERS UNION, QUETTA, and others vs REGISTRAR TRADE

UNION. BALOCHISTAN, LABOUR DIRECTORATE. QUETTA and another Case No.: Petition No,4 of 2002 Date of Judgment:2003-08-20 Reported As: 2004 PLC 103 Result: Order accordingly Judgment ORDER ' The counsel for respondent No,2 and the representative for respondent No,1, in reply to the contention raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner fairly conceded that the application could not be rejected without serving of notice under section 9 of I.R.O. 2002. ' Hence in such view of the mater it was agreed by both the parties that the matter be remanded to the respondent No,1 who after complying the legal requirements is to decide the application afresh. ' Accordingly, the order dated 24-7-2002 passed by Ist Labour Court, Quetta and order dated 1-9- 2001, passed by the respondent No,1 are set aside and the application of petitioner is remanded to respondent No,1 for its disposal after complying with all legal requirements/ formalities. ' The petition accordingly stands disposed of in the above terms.

Related Legal Research & Directories